Monday, May 25, 2009

An 'Adult' cogitation..

SEX,VAGINA,BREASTS,PENIS,SEMEN,MASTRUBATION...

There is a mild thud inside me as I write these...biological terms...I still refrain from using a few more of such explicit terms - 'why?' is what this post is about.

As I was reading Suman's 'Castration' post a couple of weeks back...my younger brother came into my room and stood behind me with his arms on the head of the chair on which I sat. At first I did not realise that he was reading the post along with me...and even after I had, I did not find any reason to react instantly. A minute or half into it- we both realised what the other person was reading and we both started.

"Err…"
"What IS this..Hina!!"

Before I could convince myself that I was not entertaining myself with a frivolous unaesthetic pornographic tale that might have qualified a nervous reaction, I found myself giving my 15 year-old brother an explanation.

"Err..Its not what you think it is..."
"Well...Of course, its not. What did I say?" he said, sniggering.
"But its NOT!" I revolted.
"Sure sure..." nodding his head in feigned understanding.

It is an art. The way he irritates me. I knew I was beating a dead horse.

I felt an urge to straighten out this misapprehension immediately. It was as though I was being convicted of a crime I did not commit. I knew what part of the post was exposed to his view in that particular moment. He must have read fragments like: "two round breasts, the opened thighs, and his erect penis…" It felt very awkward at first. I had even increased the font size of the web page through pressing the Ctrl and + keys together...so he had a rather…magnified view of my....private preoccupations.

Then I thought….. he is young and immature and so probably could not construe the aforementioned terms in anything but socially verboten terms. As this realisation dawned upon me, I became less eager to clear my position in one breath. Convinced that he knew all about sex and much more, I looked at him, trying not to fall into the trap of his annoying yet infectious snigger.
If I needed to put my point across here, seriousness was a necessary pre-requisite.

I remember how in school days, it was the 8th or 9th grade, I reckon, when we had those eye-opening Biology chapters in our curriculum. It was a tough task to exude decent nonchalance while the teacher explained (referring to diagrams, not to forget) the complex sexual anatomy of the human body. And that too, in face of racy boys who having already read the chapters back home - a scholarly eagerness rarely exhibited in any other subject - were chuckling explosively underneath their desks, bent,on pretext of picking up an intentionally dropped pen/scale/eraser/pencil. It was the scare of being reprimanded by the teacher for being so utterly shameless and 'dirty-minded' that kept a check on the chuckles and the queue of delinquents outside the class.

A few significant Biology chapters were obliterated from our course back then -perhaps for the fear of turning the students' eye-opening tutorials into wide-eyed addictions; and also to save many Biology teachers the discomfiture of addressing a class of developing hormones.

It was a year later that I learnt that ninety percent of the class had dutifully read those omitted chapters, which as I later came to know, explained the 'real thing'. I happened to be part of the other ten percent who never cared for out-of-syllabus questions in exams, and thus, remained unenlightened for yet another year.
Hence, I always found myself outside the huddle of gossiping and giggling girls who shared 'Adult' humour or in the popular jargon, 'Non-Veg jokes'. Besides the fact that I always found them crude and unfunny, I could never really ‘get’ these jokes. One could say that the former was a result of the latter. But, with all due respect to pornographic jocularity, I still have a hard time searching for the 'joke' in the 'Non-Veg'.

I vividly remember that it was a bright summer’s morning. I was walking back to the classroom from the canteen, munching blissfully on a samosa, when this candid friend of mine, accidentally spilled the beans for me.(or should I say, spilled the… samosa for me…for I couldn’t really finish it after what she revealed) I was appalled apart from merely shocked to find about the act of penetration for the first time. I kept thinking about it for a few days. I had these million questions and doubts but I did not dare ask anyone, being the shy simpleton that I was. Gradually of course I conciliated myself with the concept. But I was always ill at ease at using the terminology that referred to it, and often found myself at the other end of the following exclamations: “Tch-Tch” ,“Aww…”, “Look at her..!”, “Come-On…”, “Grow-Up!”, “It’s the reality of life” especially from those who were much more denotative in their expressions than me. I knew even then that it was not purely in the vein of discussing squarely the “reality of life” that such saucy discussions used to take place. But I was never fiercely judgmental for all I could help. For I was terribly inquisitive and interested in them myself. Only, I maintained a respectable distance and deterred from an active participation.

As I entered college, I had matured, which is to say, I did not jump at hearing the word 'sex' or the likes and could bring myself to discuss ‘issues’ explicitly.
I remember reading about this racket that installation of a condom vending machine in the JNU campus attracted. A few ultra-conservative minds were of the opinion that it spread vulgarism and further westernised India. I could not grasp the head or tail of that argument. I think we use vulgarism and the ‘It’s not our culture’ argument as a facade to conceal our hypocrisy, and a deceleration of our open-mindedness and democratic impulse. Then it becomes a case of social mores impinging on freedom of expression, and rationality being compromised in honour of ‘social taboos’. Majority of the rural population of India is totally unaware of the use of contraceptives. In fact, even most educated 'modern' city people are too shy to go to a medical store and ask for a condom and would rather risk unprotected sex. So the sentience of the agrarian society is beyond pathetic.

So, when I come across the unabashed directness of the some of the creative write-ups of Aruni or Suman, I do not know where to place these people in a comparison. Two parallel worlds, aren’t they?

But within the given context of our social setting, there will always remain words that will be needed to be minced. We sure have evolved, democratised and sensitised ourselves but surely nowhere close to being enough.As I have mentioned before, I used to be the kind of person who avoided such unfastened expressions. The kind of person who would rather use the phrase 'love-making' for 'sex'. But you realise that there is a particular terminology for particular descriptions and you cannot go on biting your lip in the garb of decency or social protocol. And as i say this, I hold vulgarism and salaciousness in a totally different arena of discussion.

I recall this scene from Walker's 'The Color Purple'(the novel that I have mentioned earlier in my first post to this blog) which is probably one of the most impressing scenes in the novel, when Shug Avery hands Celie a mirror and asks her to look at her own vagina.

"What, too shame even to go off and look at yourself..?" ....."Why, Miss Celie" she says, "you still a virgin."

Celie has mothered two children..she has been been raped continually as a child by her own father, she is given to sexual commodification by her unfeeling husband...if anything, she would have the technical know-how of sex. But the sex-education that Shug Avery imparts to Celie is something more sublime. It is about knowing and loving and respecting your own body shamelessly. About having the gumption to express your fierce individualistic desires and the needs of your body. About liberating yourself from social control.

So, I looked at my brother and I told him exactly what Suman’s post was about. I told him it was about the culture-shock that this person gets on migrating from the country to the city, about the sexual needs of a man, about a man masturbating and about motleying social protocols. Visibly,my brother was caught unawares. And his face read - "THAT was uncalled for.." Then, I found him looking at the screen of the computer pensively... He turned to me...Hmmm-ed and asked, “What does 'Castration' mean?”

I was proud of the fact that he was not sniggering anymore.

17 comments:

  1. I appreciate your daring approach in exposing conventional morality but feel really confused in drawing a boundary between 'fierce individualistic desires' and what you call 'vulgarism and salaciousness.' I hope u'll also agree there is no yardstick to determine these two diametrically opposite arguments.The same act of love making can be an enriching experience for someone while others may excoriate it as vulgar display of beastly desires.I mean it's really hard to steer past this vacillation of mind.
    Also praiseworthy is d issue of sex education which u have raised in a revolutionary(just kidding)manner.
    I want to comment a little further but some unseen force clouds my judgement as my standpoint itself seems to be vague.
    After joining MA Eng,sometimes i feel myself undergoing a huge moral and spiritual crisis,hemmed in as i find myself, between my strait-laced upbringing and enormous impact of text like Disgrace, where the protagonist,aged fifty-two,grapples with the 'problem of sex.'

    Anyway i really liked your forceful writing .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment Lalit.I had been meaning to take up this topic for quite a while now because i strongly feel about it, and when my brother 'caught' me reading Suman's post-that turned out to be the last straw..

    Actually, this evolution in my consciousness happened in BA days when our teacher taught 'The Color Purple'(one of the reasons why i love that novel). Her approach to this topic in the text was unique.She would deliberately speak out certain words/phrases that had half the class giggling and the rest uncomfortably surprised.But i guess what she was trying to do was break the barriers of our minds..those that held fundamentally natural/universal concepts like sex and the dissection of the human anatomy in the field of what i refer to as 'vulgarism and salaciousness'-which then becomes the reason for their sheepish giggles.

    Why can not we just be rational and square about these concepts? Some people would call this being uncouth and treading against a culture that propounds reticence and modesty.But I think the definition of 'our culture' has become a matter of contention now.

    The same cultured Indian people might not have any shame in urinating in the public, or might consider -drubbing women for wearing sleeveless tops and going to pubs, wife-beating, marital rapes -as part of the Indian culture but would shout hoarse in the name of westernisation if we talk of sex-education or installation of condom-vending machines etc. Dont you think that is sheer hypocrisy? I would rather call THIS 'vulgarism and salaciousness'.

    Also,
    If you are aware of this play by Mahesh Dattani, 'Thirty days in September' you would realise that children are first, completely unaware of and secondly, frightened of expressing revolt against any sexual oppression that they might have experienced within or outside their own family.And it fashions the people that they later become.
    When a girl is raped, many a conservative indian family would rather kill her than expose the rapists for the fear of bringing a bad name to the family.
    One of the reasons that sexual violence is on the rise is because we consider talking about sex a taboo.
    This is what i mean when i write about 'knowing respecting and loving you body' and 'fierce individualistic desires'.

    I completely empathize with your dilemma caused by a strait-laced upbringing as u say and exposure to a more broad-minded world of MA...i think we all should experience such a dilemma. Only then can we move towards a more democratised, and a less socially-controlled and prejudiced world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks. Now I can see ur stance on d ongoing debate between hypocrisy and liberalism. No one can deny that all sorts of conservatism should be denounced in d severest terms in order to fend off any prospect of sexual exploitation of women, children and,of course, men. But sometimes i do feel that both forms of hypocrisies-moral and liberal- must be shunned as both are equally disastrous.
    The power of patriarchal authority is so deeply entrenched that women,on the name of westernisation, are participating in their own commodification and exploitation.Here I cant help myself recalling one instance of cultural coercion i witnessed a couple of days ago while watching an IPL match where players were shivering with cold but cheerleaders were dancing in scanty clothes merely to satiate the visual lust of a few privileged ones.So, how to categorise this sort of exploitative emancipation which is being perpetuated by d influece of the western culture which operates with the idea:pleasure in d beginning, in d middle and in d end. Another example can be seen in sexual tourism which is thriving on paedophilia...
    Though i completely agree with u yet when i repeatedly talked about drawing a boundary,i w referred to this balance...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sure..the coin is two-faced. Just as conservatism hides behind a culture facade, Liberality can just as easily don the aspect of what you call 'exploitative emancipation'.

    As for the cheerleaders..demand precedes supply..and i think it is unfair to call it 'cultural coercion'. Would you call the item numbers in Bollywood movies (with whom these cheer-leaders are often compared) an infuence of western cinema?

    I dont think the cheerleaders are 'victimised' (if thats what you mean to say)on a culture-specific ground.I dont think it would be too far-fetched to say that this industry thrives on the same principle that perpetuates prostitution, which is rampant in India, and is definitely not a product of western influence.

    What are we actively doing to spread the tenets of our culture? All we are doing is repelling this 'western influence' blindly.The opposition to valentine's day celebrations expressed radically by RSS and the likes is an instance to support that.And these are the same people who will also object to condom-vending machines being installed in campuses.What is there solution to deal with unwanted pregnancies,sexually-transmitted diseases etc?

    We are responsible for our own corruption...we lack the courage of conviction to sustain the goodness of own beliefs, along with the absence of flexibility and the necessary discretion to embrace only the goodness of a foreign culture.

    PS: I apologise if i read a bit offensive to you.:)

    ReplyDelete
  5. NO no, not offensive at all... Its not necessary dat ur perspective should coincide with that of mine... Moreover,im neither a self-proclaimed custodian of public morals nor a member of any 'Sena'.Haha! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great Job gal,damn impressed nd i loved the humorous touch to your piece in the end!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. umm..thanks swati..good to know you liked it!

    ReplyDelete
  8. {Hina i agree with all you say .. cudn't agree more.. i only don't agree with what i didn't understand (the "refer to context" parts) cz well.. i didn't understand. :)But I like blogs where comments could make for separate entries.}

    Here are some musings..born out of the thread..

    Actually these very flagbearers of religion are the ones who need to proclaim their purity and commitment/ loyalty. Folks like us, who may be as religious or even more pious than any of them, don't really need to shout out loud our allegiance to Indian culture or how and when we admire it. These are self-styled protectors of Indian ethos and culture who will go on about their value system that is already in tatters, thanks to their hooliganism.

    Daughter raped? Hide her? Husband beats the wife? Hide the bruises..make excuses. Bride burnt to death? Cremate her even before her family is informed. When it comes to being honest NOW in the name of God, they will sit mute, they will abuse the very idols they worship.

    Western or whatever...suppression and ignorance on leads to trouble for any generation. The former takes the form of a revolt and the latter is perilous in today's day and time.

    Having said this, I would say I am not very disappointed with the Indian masses and their thinking..specially the younger generation. The kind of repulsion and public outburst the Mangalore incident and such idiotic antics created have brought down the likes of Bajrang Dal Sri Ram Sene at the lowest levels of repute.

    I could go on.. but whatever i write now.. would recapitulate Hina's views. The fact that we are best friends notwithstanding. (chuckle)

    Good work myte!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, a little positivity is required to rule out any chance of cynicism and hopelessness that the post-'post' reactions might have unintentionally expressed...The Youth indeed seems to be a site for a promising future because it thrives sans the superstitions and prejudices of the past.And we are en route...to a better future.

    This has turned out to be more than i intended to spark discussion over.But all the better.

    And about the things you didnt understand Neha; you are welcome to give me a call anytime,'myte'.

    thanks for the comment.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just wanted to add a quick word. Its quite amazing to read the long thread of comments, and I want to commend the good job you have done by posting this piece. Its good to have so much difference and dialogue... I started thinking on my own and have a lot to say but I'm going to be selfish and not post it as a public comment right away. I'll let it ferment and grow and then maybe share it here.
    I particularly wanted to say this- although i know you didnt mean any offence and it wasnt a big deal anyway. You have mentioned Aruni and Suman in the same phrase, and i felt like i was being unfairly categorised in a way I dont particularly like. Honestly i thought the piece "Castration" was too crude, and I would never treat something so beautiful and complex in such a reductive and crude manner. I agree with you when you speak about the appreciation and acceptance of the body, on an individual level. That's pretty much hit the nail on the head.
    And yes, I am on your (Hina's) side on the Cheerleader question.
    Lalit, if you assume for yourself the authority to decide for the cheerleader what to wear and how to avoid "exploitation", then you risk the kind of hypocrisies that you (and we too) hate.
    The cultural and spiritual crisis you feel is not yours alone. And the crisis which you feel should open you up and make you sympathise with others, because we all feel the crisis. And we includes everyone. Even cheerleaders.
    (No offence meant, only in case my tone has become too much of a hectoring sermon or lecture.)
    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  11. My apologies Aruni,if you feel unjustifiably categorised.But i must make it clear that i did not club you with Suman because of the treatment of the subjects you write about(which are very different as they are), rather the frankness with which both of you write.Suman's 'Castration' post might have been crude but i guess he meant it to be that way.He didnt seem to be writing about 'something beautiful' anyway.I wonder how could he have treated the same subject more sensitively.(calling out to Suman to certify my supposition!)

    Besides,
    Your individual subjects and their treatment are definitely unique to you both.But when i read some of your posts, even those of your personal blog, i find you have the gumption to 'approach' certain topics -which is the only ground i meant to liken you both and nowhere else.

    I meant to say that here are people, creating art(prose or poetry whatever) out of what others are too subdued or castigated for, to even utter/express.

    Hope i have manaaged to clear myself without any more presumptions and offence.:)

    Anyway, Thanks for the comment and i look forward to the one that you intend to post later.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Last time when i posted a comment here i had decided not to prolong the debate lest I should put myself wrong and be misinterpreted. But after going through Aruni’s comment I couldn’t help myself adding something more, particularly on the question of d cheerleaders. When I raised the issue of cultural subjugation on the name of liberation my intention was not to show how much clothes they wear(as this is under neither my jurisdiction nor theirs though Id stressed on the word shivering cold),in fact, I meant to say that, to elaborate it a little further, the hidden forces that are operating there work on the same grounds on which neocolonialism works.
    A few days ago while reading Foucault I came across a sentence from ‘History of Sexuality’, where he says that the irony of our endless preoccupation with sexuality lies in the fact that we regard it as an act of liberation…
    Though u justified d performance of d cheerleaders on d basis of demand and supply, can we justify prostitution and sex tourism rampant in South Asia on the same grounds? One quick word about its comparison with ‘item numbers’. One difference which is visible to me is that while the former is realistic, the latter creates a virtual reality.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. I objected to your citing Cheer-leading as an example of Culture Coercion. Western culture being coerced on Indian culture. Why?

    a. Cheer leading...as defined by Wikipedia-
    "Cheerleading is a sport that uses...elements of tumbling, dance, jumps, cheers, and stunting to direct spectators of events to cheer on sports teams at games and matches and/or compete at cheerleading competitions. Cheerleaders draw attention to the event and encourage audience participation. The athlete involved is called a cheerleader."
    I never 'justified’ cheerleading because there was nothing to justify.

    b. IF cheerleading is fast becoming a site of "satisfying the visual lust of a privileged few" then i feel it’s not the fault of AMERICAN society but every individual everywhere who enjoys the idea of sexually-charged virtual/actual entertainment. And certainly the WEST cannot be credited with introducing this idea of 'pleasure' in India.

    I am sure you are aware dances like Lavani (Attractive women wearing...saris typically perform the dance.. These women synchronized sensually to a catching tune and teasing lyrics..)
    Then there is the Mujras (a form of dance originated by North-Indian Tawaif (muslim courtesans) during the Mughal era.)

    These performances became more sensual and less artistic gradually. Cheerleading seems to be en route to the same fate. The working principle being the relationship of Demand and Supply. And the change in demand was not triggered by any foreign influence.
    I never likened the Cheerleaders with Prostitutes but with the aforementioned principle that perpetuates the latter and seems to be corrupting the former. We demand, and effect supply and then we (might not be the same people but its the same society nevertheless) condemn the people who supply and alter supply according to changing demands.

    You could also add Japenese Geisha's in the above instances. So I think, there exists an ideology that motivates degradation of Art to Entertainment, an ideology that motivates visual/physical gratification centered on sexuality. Its neither Asian nor American- It’s human.

    2. “the irony of our endless preoccupation with sexuality lies in the fact that we regard it as an act of liberation…”

    I agree…but who was talking about sexual Preoccupation? I, in fact, was talking about lack of basic awareness, breaking of the chains of a ‘culture’ that stop us from talking about AIDS, about contraceptives, about breast cancer…etc…In fact, talking about it openly, will demystify the people who are preoccupied with it…

    You are on the one extreme while I am on the other…while I am talking about LACK OF ‘progress’…u talk of TOO MUCH ‘progress’…we have to understand that both are fatal.

    3. As regards forces of neocolonialism--I came up with this essay while surfing the internet that I think sums it best-here’s an extract-

    "Virtually every nation in the world, whether colonised or not, has had to deal with western hegemony. Antonio Gramsci defined hegemony as an order in which a certain way of life and thought is dominant and one concept of reality prevails throughout society. The dominant ideology permeates every facet of human existence - taste, morality, customs, religious and political principles. Since the nineteenth century the West has defined human development and set the pace of change which others have followed. The West has not imposed its will on the world by force but by the sheer attractiveness of its civilisation and the belief in the desirability of material progress and prosperity. It is able get people in other nations to desire what it desires and thereby manipulates their aspirations. This is the bedrock of imperialism. It is what enables it to control and use the resources of underdeveloped nations in a manner advantageous to the developed nations and at the expense of the economies of underdeveloped countries."

    So whether its our inherent inadequacies or somebody else's influence, that’s open for discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Alright. If Ive misinterpreted u or gone too far into the discussion, plz forgive me and forget about that.
    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Oh O...hey you're free to hold your views .Hope the tone of my comment didnt irk you..I meant well.

    Your apology is uncalled for.Lets just say then that we agree to disagree.:)

    We should put up a disclaimer here..."Nobody means to be offensive (except when they do) to anybody." so that we dont have to worry about adding "i didnt mean to offend you" or "I hope my tone isnt impolite" etc. at the foot of every comment.

    Hehe!Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. thanks hina for including me in sth tha has gone to be a huge thing now. sorry for my late arrival. i m seldom here nowadays. just a little comment about my "castration". i was deleberately crude there because that was what i was trying to show. i m sensitive towards love, lovemaking, loving and all the aesthetic paraphernalia attatched with the ide of love. but i have also seen the rfrustrated love that shos itself through ugly(for sensitive eyes) hip moves at the sight of some girl. it is just about different worlds. love is not always lovely in a sensitive manner. sometimes it is really ugly. a write should love the both with the same boldness.

    ReplyDelete
  17. When he learned to define his goodness internally instead of externally through his work and performance, he was gradually able to let go of his own judgments.For more information:http://ping.fm/5kK8I

    ReplyDelete